Improved Stall Delay Model for HAWT Performance Predictions using 3D Navier-Stokes Solver and Actuator Disk Method

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Laboratory of Mechanical Engineering and Development (LGMD), National Polytechnic School -ENP-, P.B. 182 El-Harrach, Algiers, 16200, Algeria

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, 2500 University Boulevard, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

The Actuator Disk Method (ADM), in its analytical formulation or combined with Navier-Stokes equations, is widely used for design and/or for aerodynamic analysis of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines (HAWT). This method has demonstrated its capabilities for performance predictions of HAWT rotors for limited range of wind speeds with lower angles of attack values, i.e. attached flow conditions. However, for typical wind speeds that rotor encounters, under higher angles of attack i.e. stall conditions, such a method cannot describe accurately the flow characteristics around rotor-blades due to severe flow separations coupled with the effects of blades rotation as well as the radial flow over the blades. In this paper, original correction approaches have been proposed for the existing stall delay models to take into account both the blade rotation and the radial flow effects over the rotor blades. For this purpose, the ADM combined with 3D- NavierStokes equations formulation using Large Eddy Simulations (LES) model has been considered to describe the incompressible turbulent flow field around HAWT rotor blades. The resulting mathematical model has been solved using a 3D in-house subroutine developed with OpenFOAM code. The proposed numerical method has been validated against the well recognized reference measurements obtained using the New MEXICO and the NREL Phase VI experimental wind turbines. In comparison with existing stall delay models, the proposed correction
approaches, especially the radial flow approach, have shown noticeable enhancements on performance predictions of HAWT rotors compared to the experimental measurements. It has been found very low discrepancies to the experimental torque and thrust values, up to 1% and 10% have been recorded respectively.

Keywords


Amini, S., M. R. Golzarian, E. Mahmoodi, A. Jeromin and M. H. Abbaspour-Fard (2021). Numerical simulation of the mexico wind turbine using the actuator disk model along with the 3d correction of aerodynamic coefficients in openfoam. Renewable Energy 163, 2029 – 2036.##
Boorsma, K. and J. Schepers (2016, sep). Rotor experiments in controlled conditions continued: New mexico. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 753, 022004.##
Breton, S.-P., F. N. Coton and G. Moe (2008). A study on rotational effects and different stall delay models using a prescribed wake vortex scheme and nrel phase vi experiment data. Wind Energy 11(5), 459–482.##
Chaviaropoulos, P. K. and M. O. L. Hansen (2000). Investigating Three-Dimensional and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blades by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier-Stokes Solver. Journal of Fluids Engineering 122(2), 330–336.##
Corrigan, J. J. and J. Schillings (1994). Empirical model for stall delay due to rotation. In American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialists Conference, San Francisco, CA, Volume 21.##
Du, Z. and M. Selig (1998). A 3-d stall-delay model for horizontal axis wind turbine performance prediction. In 1998 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, pp. 21.##
Dumitrescu, H. and V. Cardos (2012). Inboard stall delay due to rotation. Journal of Aircraft 49(1), 101–107.##
Dumitrescu, H., V. Cardos and A. Dumitrache (2007). Modelling of inboard stall delay due to rotation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 75, pp. 012022. IOP Publishing.##
Fingersh, L., D. Simms, M. Hand, D. Jager, J. Cotrell, M. Robinson, S. Schreck and S. M. Larwood (2001). Wind tunnel testing of nrel’s unsteady aerodynamics experiment. In 20th ASME Wind Energy Symposium.##
Froude, R. E. (1889). On the part played in propulsion by differences of fluid pressure. Transactions of the Institution of Naval Architects 30, 390.##
Glauert, H. (1963). Airplane propellers, Aerodynamic theory. Dover Publications, New York.##
Guntur, S. (2013). A detailed study of the rotational augmentation and dynamic stall phenomena for wind turbines. Ph. D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark.##
Hansen, M. (2008). Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines: second edition (2 ed.). Earthscan.##
Himmelskamp, H. (1947). Profile investigations on a rotating airscrew. Ministry of Aircraft Production.##
Horlock, J. H. (1978). Actuator disk theorydiscontinuities in thermo-fluid dynamics. New York, McGraw-Hill International Book Co., 1978. 256 p.##
Hu, D., O. Hua and Z. Du (2006). A study on stall-delay for horizontal axis wind turbine. Renewable Energy 31(6), 821 – 836.##
IRENA (2019). Future of wind: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects. In International Renewable Energy Agency.##
Issa, R. I. (1986). Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. Journal of Computational Physics 62(1), 40–65.##
Lee, H. M. and Y. Wu (2013). An experimental study of stall delay on the blade of a horizontal-axis wind turbine using tomographic particle image velocimetry. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 123, 56 – 68.##
Lee, H. M. and Y. Wu (2015). A tomo-piv study of the effects of freestream turbulence on stall delay of the blade of a horizontalaxis wind turbine. Wind Energy 18(7), 1185– 1205.##
Lindenburg, C. (2004). Modelling of rotational augmentation based on engineering considerations and measurements. In European Wind Energy Conference, London, 22–25.##
Madsen,      H. A. and F. Rasmussen (1988).Derivation of three-dimensional airfoil data on the basis of experiment and theory. In Proceedings Windpower(88), 166–174.##
Masson, C. and A. Smali (2006). Numerical study of turbulent flow around a wind turbine nacelle. Wind Energy 9(3), 281–298.##
Masson, C., A. Smali, I. Ammara and C. Leclerc (2000). Aerodynamic investigations on tower-shadow impacts for hawts. In Proceedings of the ASME Wind Energy Symposium, AIAA.##
Masson, C., A. Smali and C. Leclerc (2001). Aerodynamic analysis of hawts operating in unsteady conditions. Wind Energy 4(1), 1– 22.##
McCroskey, W. J. (1971). Measurements of boundary layer transition, separation and streamline direction on rotating blades, Volume 6321. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.##
Prandtl, L. and A. Betz (1927). Vier abhandlungen zur hydrodynamik und aerodynamik. Kaiser Wilhelm-Institut fr Strmungsforschung.##
Rankine, W. J. M. (1865). On the mechanical principles of the action of propellers. Transactions of the Institution of Naval Architects 6.##
Schepers, J., K. Boorsma and X. Munduate (2014). Final results from mexnext-i: Analysis of detailed aerodynamic measurements on a 4.5 m diameter rotor placed in the large german dutch wind tunnel dnw. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 555, pp. 012089. IOP Publishing.##
Shen, W. Z., R. Mikkelsen, J. N. Sørensen and C. Bak (2005). Tip loss corrections for wind turbine computations. Wind Energy 8(4), 457–475.##
Simms, D., S. Schreck, M. Hand and L. J. Fingersh (2001). Nrel unsteady aerodynamics experiment in the nasa-ames wind tunnel: a comparison of predictions to measurements. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (US).##
Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. the basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review 91(3), 99–164.##
Smali, A. and C. Masson (2003, 01). Numerical Investigations of Nacelle Anemometry for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines. In Wind Energy Symposium, 389–398.##
Smali, A. and C. Masson (2004). On the rotor effects upon nacelle anemometry for wind turbines. Wind Engineering 28(6), 695–713.##
Snel, H., R. Houwink, J. Bosschers (1994). Sectional prediction of lift coefficients on rotating wind turbine blades in stall. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation Petten, Netherlands.##
Sørensen, J. N. and A. Myken (1992). Unsteady actuator disc model for horizontal axis wind turbines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 39(1-3), 139–149.##
Sørensen, J. N., K. Nilsson, S. Ivanell, H. Asmuth and R. F. Mikkelsen (2020). Analytical body forces in numerical actuator disc model of wind turbines. Renewable Energy 147, 2259 – 2271.##
Stevens, R. J., L. A. Martnez-Tossas and C. Meneveau (2018). Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments. Renewable Energy 116, 470 – 478.##
Tahani, M. and M. Moradi (2016). Aerodynamic investigation of a wind turbine using cfd and modified bem methods. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 9(1), 107-111.##
Tata, M., A. Smaili and C. Masson (2018). Effect of grid topology on numerical simulations of flow fields around wind turbine nacelle anemometer. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 11(6), 1569–1578.##
Wimshurst, A. and R. H. J. Willden (2017). Analysis of a tip correction factor for horizontal axis turbines. Wind Energy 20(9), 1515–1528.##
Yu, G., X. Shen, X. Zhu and Z. Du (2011). An insight into the separate flow and stall delay for hawt. Renewable Energy 36(1), 69 – 76.##
Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 63
January and February 2022
Pages 37-50
  • Received: 01 February 2021
  • Revised: 10 July 2021
  • Accepted: 20 July 2021
  • First Publish Date: 12 November 2021