Numerical Modeling of Interactions between Solitary Waves and Floating Breakwaters

Document Type : Regular Article


1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul 34295, Turkey

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34349, Turkey

3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand

4 National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand



In the current numerical work, a 2D wave tank has been planned to explain the shared impacts among three different solitary waves and three different floating breakwaters by applying Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes models and the volume of fluid method. Three dissimilar floating breakwaters (i.e., square breakwater, circular breakwater, and modified breakwater) were chosen. A total of eighteen cases were investigated, including three different floating breakwaters, a solitary wave (SW) with three different wave heights, and two different densities of floating breakwaters. We achieved the production of a solitary wave by moving a wave paddle (WP) and the motion of floating breakwater in two various directions by applying two different codes as user-defined functions. The dynamic mesh technique has been employed for re-forming mesh during the motion of the wave paddle and the floating breakwater. The numerical calculations have been confirmed by some numerical, analytical, and experimental case studies. First, the generation of a SW using the WP movement and the free motion of a heaving round cylinder on the free surface of motionless water were modeled and validated. Additionally, the effects of various parameters, including floating breakwater shape, floating breakwater density, and solitary wave height, on the hydrodynamic performances of the floating breakwater, the floating breakwater’s motions, and the free-surface elevation were considered under various conditions.


ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide (2013). ANSYS, Inc.: Canonsburg, PA, USA. pp. 724–746.##
Batchelor, G. K. (2000). An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.##
Chen, Q., J. Zang, J. Birchall, D. Ning, X. Zhao and J. Gao (2020). On the hydrodynamic performance of a vertical pile-restrained WEC-type floating breakwater. Renewable Energy 146, 414-425.##
Cheng, L. and P. Lin (2018). The numerical modeling of coupled motions of a moored floating body in waves. Water 10, 1748.##
Eren, E. T., M. Tabatabaei-malazi and G. Temir (2020). Numerical investigation on the collision between a solitary wave and a moving cylinder. Water 12, 2167.##
Hu, X., Y. Jiang and D. Cai (2017). Numerical modeling and simulation of wave impact of a circular cylinder during the submergence process. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering 1–14.##
Ito, S. (1977). Study of the transient heave oscillation of a floating cylinder. Gr. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.##
Ji, C., Y. Cheng, K. Yang and G. Oleg (2017). Numerical and experimental investigation of hydrodynamic performance of a cylindrical dual pontoon-net floating breakwater. Coastal Engineering 129, 1–16.##
Liang, D., W. Jian, S. Shao, R. Chen and K. Yung (2017) Incompressible SPH simulation of solitary wave interaction with movable seawalls. Journal of Fluids and Structures 69, 72-88.##
Lin, P. (2006) A multiple-layer r-coordinate model for simulation. Computers & Fluids 35, 147–167.##
Lin, P. (2007). A fixed-grid model for simulation of a moving body in free surface flows. Computers & Fluids 36, 549–561.##
Liu, X., P. Lin and S. Shao (2014). An ISPH simulation of coupled structure interaction with free surface flows. Journal of Fluids and Structures 48, 46-61.##
Liu, Z. and Y. Wang (2020a). Studies of submerged moored box-type floating breakwaters with different shapes of cross-sections using SPH. Coastal Engineering 158, 103687.##
Liu, Z. and Y. Wang (2020b). Numerical investigations and optimizations of typical submerged box-type floating breakwaters using SPH. Ocean Engineering 209, 107475.##
Maskell, S. J. and F. Ursell (1970). The transient motion of a floating body. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 44, 303-13.##
Nikpoura, A. H. and M. N. Moghima and M. A. Badrib (2019). Experimental study of wave attenuation in trapezoidal floating break waters. China Ocean Engineering 33(1), 103–113.##
Ninga, D. Z. X. L. Zhaoa, M. Zhaoa, M. Hannc and H. G. Kang (2017). Analytical investigation of hydrodynamic performance of a dual pontoon WEC-type breakwater. Applied Ocean Research 65, 102–111.##
Olcay, A. B. and M. Tabatabaei Malazi (2016). The effects of a longfin inshore squid’s fins on propulsive efficiency during underwater swimming.  Ocean Engineering 128, 173–182.##
Peng, W., W. Lee, S. H. Shin and N. Mizutani (2013). Numerical simulation of interactions between water waves and inclined-moored submerged floating breakwaters. Coastal Engineering 82, 76–87.##
Qu, K., W. Y. Sun, S. Kraatz. B. Deng and C. B. Jiang (2017). Effects of floating breakwater on hydrodynamic load of low-lying bridge deck under impact of cnoidal wave. Ocean Engineering 203, 107217.##
Ren, Y., M. Luo and P. Lin (2019). Consistent Particle Method Simulation of Solitary Wave Interaction with a Submerged Breakwater. Water 11, 261.##
Seiffert, B., M. Hayatdavoodi and R. C. Ertekin (2014). Experiments and computations of solitary-wave forces on a coastal-bridge deck. Part I: Flat Plate. Coastal Engineering 88, 194–209.##
Shen, Y. M. C. O. Ng and Y. H. Zheng (2004). Simulation of wave propagation over a submerged bar using the VOF method with a two-equation k-" turbulence modeling. Ocean Engineering 31, 87–95.##
Tabatabaei Malazi, M., E. T. Eren, J. Luo, S. Mi and G. Temir (2020). Three-Dimensional Fluid–Structure Interaction case study on elastic beam. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8, 714.##
Tian, X., Q. Wang, G., Liu, W. Deng and Z. Gao (2018). Numerical and Experimental Studies on a Three-Dimensional Numerical Wave Tank. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 6, 6585–6593.##
Tsai, C. P., Y. C. Chen, C. J. Chen and C. Lin (2016). Simulation of the effect of breakwater on the propagation of solitary waves. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 24 (4), 780–789.##
Vasudev, K. L., R. Sharma and S. K. Bhattacharyya (2014). A multi-objective optimization design framework integrated with CFD for the design of AUVs. Methods in Oceanography 10, 138–165.##
Wu, N. J., S. H. Hsiao, H. H., Chen and R. Y. Yang (2016). The study on solitary waves generated by a piston-type wave maker. Ocean Engineering 117, 114–129.##
You, R., G. He, J. Wang and P. Liu (2019). CIP-based analysis on strongly nonlinear interaction between solitary waves and submerged flat plate. Ocean Engineering 176, 211–221.##
Yu, P., G. Chen, X. Peng, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang and W. Wang (2021).  Verification and application of 2-D DDA-SPH method in solving fluid–structure interaction problems. Journal of Fluids and Structures 102, 103252.##
Zhan, J. M., X. B. Chen, Y. J. Gong and W. Q. Hu (2017). Numerical investigation of the interaction between an inverse T-type fixed/floating breakwater and regular/irregular waves. Ocean Engineering 137, 110–119.##
Zhang, X., Q. Zeng, and Z. Liu (2019). Hydrodynamic performance of rectangular heaving buoys for an integrated floating breakwater. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7, 239.##
Zheng, X., X. Lv, Q. Ma, W. Duan, A. Khayyer and S. Shao (2018). An improved solid boundary treatment for wave–float interactions using ISPH method. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 10, 329-347.##
Volume 15, Issue 6 - Serial Number 67
November and December 2022
Pages 1675-1691
  • Received: 11 March 2022
  • Revised: 27 June 2022
  • Accepted: 28 June 2022
  • First Publish Date: 07 September 2022