Numerical Study of Flow Control on Simplified High-Lift Configurations

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Technological Institute of Aeronautics, São José dos Campos, SP, 12228-900, Brazil

2 Institute of Aeronautics and Space, São José dos Campos, SP, 12224-904, Brazil

10.47176/jafm.16.04.1555

Abstract

Enhancement in the aerodynamic performance of wings and airfoils is very notable when Active Flow Control (AFC) is applied to Short Take-off and Landing aircraft (STOL). The present numerical study shows the application of steady, pulsed and synthetic tangential jets applied to the plain flap shoulder of a modified NASA Trapezoidal Wing. Pulsed jets are modeled by sinusoidal and square waveforms while synthetic jets are modeled only by pure sine waveform. The freestream airflow conditions are Mach number equal to 0.2 and Reynolds number equal to 4.3 million based on the mean aerodynamic chord. The presented simulations are two-dimensional and based on RANS for steady jet cases and URANS for pulsed and synthetic cases, compiled with the open-source suite SU2 and adapted for time varying boundary conditions. Numerical results for modified configurations based on the same baseline wing profile considering different leading edges, jet slot height, flap position, blowing mass flow, type and frequency of the jets are presented. Curves of pressure coefficient distribution revealed a substantial influence upstream of the AFC, around the slat and main element. The jet slot height analysis showed that the lift gain is also influenced by the slot size due to the change of the local flow velocity considering the same blowing momentum coefficient. Regarding the jet frequency, no significant differences on the lift coefficients were found between the reduced frequencies F+ equal to 1 and 2. Results of aerodynamic loads showed an improved lift coefficient in relation to the baseline airfoil when pulsed and steady jets are employed. Pulsed jets under square waveform were effective even at high deflected flap condition at 50°, with a significant gain in the lift coefficient of 36%, in relation to the uncontrolled case, combined with a drag reduction of 20%, and a decrease in mass flow up to 49% in relation to the steady jet for the same lift gain. Although sine and square waveform results presented similar improvements for lift, the drag is around 15% higher for the former. When compared with the steady jet case, the mass flow reduction is 36% for the sinewave. Synthetic jets with zero-net-mass-flux proved superior to the baseline conventional multi-element airfoil only with deployed flap at 50°, where a modest lift improvement of 5% was observed.

Keywords


Abbott, I. H. and A. Von Doenhoff (1959). Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.##
Abramova, K. A., A.V. Petrov, A. V. Potapchik and V. G. Soudakov (2020). Experimental investigation of transonic buffet control on a wing airfoil using tangential jet blowing. Fluid Dynamics 55(4), 545-553.##
Anders, S. G., W. L. Sellers III and A. E. Washburn (2004). Active flow control activities at NASA Langley. In Proceedings of the 2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, Portland OR.##
Bushnell, D. M. and I. Wygnanski (2020). Flow control applications. NASA/TM 220436.##
Cattafesta, L. N. and M. Sheplak (2011). Actuators for active flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics (43), 247-272.##
Celik, I. B.; U. Ghia, P. J. Roache and C. J. Freitas (2008). Procedure for estimating and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering 130(7): 078001.##
Chapin, V. G. and E. Bernard (2015). Active control of a stalled airfoil through steady or unsteady actuation jets. Journal of Fluids Engineering 137(9), 091103.##
Ciobaca, V. and J. Wild (2013). An overview of recent DLR contributions on active flow-separation control studies for high-lift configurations. Journal AerospaceLab (6), 1-12.##
Couluris, G. J., D. Signor and J. Phillips (2010). Cruise-efficient short takeoff and landing (CESTOL): potential impact on air traffic operations. NASA/CR 216392.##
Crippa, S., S. Milber-Wilkending and R. Rudnik (2011). DLR Contribution to the first high lift prediction workshop. In Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando FL.##
Deere, K. (2003). Summary of fluidic thrust vectoring research at NASA langley research center. In Proceedings of the 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Orlando FL, AIAA.##
Delfs, J. W., C. Appel, P. Bernicke, C. Blech, J. Blinstrub, C. Heykena, P. Kumar, K. Kutscher, N. Lippitz, L. Rossian, L. Savoni and M. Lummer (2017). Aircraft and technology for low noise short take-off and landing. In Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver CO, AIAA.##
DeSalvo, M., E. Whalen and A. Glezer (2020). High-lift performance enhancement using active flow control. AIAA Journal 58(10), 1-15.##
Diekmann, J. H. (2019). Flight mechanical challenges of STOL aircraft using active high-lift. Journal of Aircraft 56(5), 1-12.##
Dods Jr., J. B. and E. C. Watson (1976). The Effects of Blowing Over Various Trailing-Edge Flaps on an NACA 0006 Airfoil Section, Comparisons with Various Types of Flaps on Other Airfoil Sections, and an Analysis of Flow and Power Relationships for Blowing Systems. NASA TN D-8293.##
Durrani, N. and B. A. Haider (2011). Study of stall delay over a generic airfoil using synthetic jet actuator. In Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2011, Orlando FL, AIAA.##
Economon, T. D., F. Palacios, S. R. Copeland, T. W. Lukaczyk and J. J. Alonso (2016). SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design. AIAA Journal 54(3), 828-846.##
Ekaterinaris, J. A. (2004). Prediction of active flow control performance on airfoils and wings. Aerospace Science and Technology 8(5), 401-410.##
Englar, R. J. (1972). Two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel investigations of a cambered 30 percent thick circulation control airfoil. Naval Ship Research and Development Center AD913411.##
Englar, R. J. and G. G. Huson (1983). Development of advanced circulation control wing high lift airfoils. In Proceedings of the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Danvers MA, AIAA.##
Goffert, B., R. G. Silva, C. P. F. Francisco, E. Pigusov, C. Wei, Z. Qian and M. L. C. C. Reis (2021). Numerical study of a wing section with a tangential blowing jet control system. In Proceedings of CHT-21 ICHMT International Symposium on Advances in Computational Heat Transfer, Online, CHT-21-169.##
Greenblatt, D., I. J. Wygnanski and C. L. Rumsey (2010). Aerodynamic Flow Control, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.##
Hannon, J. A., A. E. Washburn, L. N. Jenkins and R. D. Watson (2012). Trapezoidal wing experimental repeatability and velocity profiles in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (Invited). In Proceedings of 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville TN, AIAA.##
Hartwich, P. M., P. P. Camacho, K. El-Gohary, A. B. Gonzales, E. L. Lawson and A. Shmilovich (2017). System-level trade studies for transonic transports with active flow control (AFC) enhanced high-lift systems. In Proceedings of 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine TX, AIAA.##
Haucke, F. and W. Nitsche (2013). Active flow control on the flap of a 2D high-lift wing section towards high Reynolds number application. In Proceedings of 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Diego CA, AIAA.##
Hogue, J., M. Brosche, W. Oates and J. Clark (2009). Development of a piezoelectric supersonic microactuator for broadband flow control. In Proceedings of the Florida Center for Advanced Aero-Propulsion Conference, Tallahassee FL.##
Holl, T., A. K. vel Job, P. Giacopinelli and F. Thiele (2012). Numerical study of active flow control on a high-lift configuration. Journal of Aircraft 49(5), 1406-1422.##
Hue, D., C. François, J. Dandois and A. Gebhardt (2017). Simulations of an aircraft with constant and pulsed blowing flow control at the engine/wing junction. Aerospace Science and Technology (69), 659-673.##
Johnson, P. L., K. M. Jones and M. D. Madson (2000). Experimental investigation of a simplified 3D high lift configuration in support of CFD validation. In Proceedings of 18th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference and Exhibit, Denver CO, AIAA.##
Jones, G. S., C. S. Yao and B. G. Allan (2006). Experimental investigation of a 2D supercritical circulation-control airfoil using Particle Image Velocimetry. In Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, San Francisco CA, AIAA.##
Jones, G. S., J. C. Lin, B. G. Allan, W. E. Milholen, C. L. Rumsey and R. C. Swanson (2008). Overview of CFD validation experiments for circulation control applications at NASA. In International Powered Lift Conference, London.##
Jones, G. S., W. E. Milholen, D. T. Chan, S. L. Goodliff, C. M. Cagle and J. S. Fell (2018). A discrete and distributed steady blowing application on high Reynolds number semispan supercritical wing configuration (Invited). In Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting, Kissimmee FL, AIAA.##
Kauth, F., D. G. François, Y. E. Sayed, R. Semaan, C. Behr, M. Schwerter, M. Leester-Schädel, V. Srinivas, F. Nolte, G. Narjes, J. Müller, C. Atalayer, D. Giesecke, T. Müller, R. Radespiel and J. R. Seume (2017). Progress in efficient active high-lift. In Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver CO, AIAA.##
Lawford, J. A. and D. N. Foster (1969). Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Tests on a Wing Section with Plain Leading- and Trailing-Edge Flaps Having Boundary-Layer Control by Bowing, Reports and Memoranda N. 3639. London Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.##
Lin, J. C., L. P. Melton, J. A. Hannon, M. Y. Andino, M. Koklu, K. B. Paschal and V. N. Vatsa (2019). Wind tunnel testing of active flow control on high-lift common research model. In Proceedings of AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas TX, AIAA.##
Lin, J. C., L. P. Melton, S. A. Viken, M. Y. Andino, M. Koklu, J. A. Hannon and V.N Vatsa (2017). High lift common research model for wind tunnel testing: an active flow control perspective. In Proceedings of 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine TX, AIAA.##
Liu, Y., L. N. Sankar, R. J. Englar, K. K. Ahuja and R. Gaeta (2004). Computational evaluation of the steady and pulsed jet effects on the performance of a circulation control wing section. In Proceedings of 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, AIAA.##
Liu, Z. and G. Zha (2016). Transonic airfoil performance enhancement using co-flow jet active flow control. In Proceedings of 8th AIAA Flow Control Conference, Washington-DC, AIAA.##
Liu, Z., Z. Luo, Q. Liu and Y. Zhou (2020). Modulation of driving signals in flow control over an airfoil with synthetic jet. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 33(12), 3138-3148.##
Masiol, M. and R. M. Harrison (2014). Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review. Atmospheric Environment (95), 409-455.##
Melton, L. P., M. Koklu, M. Andino and J. C. Lin (2018). Active flow control via discrete sweeping and steady jets on a simple-hinged flap. AIAA Journal 56(8), 2961-2973.##
Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32(8), 1598-1605.##
Meredith, P. T. (1993). Viscous phenomena affecting high-lift systems and suggestions for future CFD development. High-Lift System Aerodynamics, AGARD CP-515, 19/1-8.##
Oberkampf, W. L. and C. J. Roy (2010). Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press.##
Palacios, F., T. D. Economon, A. Aranake, S. R. Copeland, A. K. Lonkar, T. W. Lukaczyk, D. E. Manosalvas, K.R. Naik, S. Padron, B. Tracey, A. Variyar and J. J. Alonso (2014). Stanford university unstructured (su2): analysis and design technology for turbulent flows. In Proceedings of the 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, National Harbor MD. AIAA.##
Pavlenko, O., A. Petrov and E. Pigusov (2018). Concept of medium twin-engine STOL transport airplane. In Proceedings of 31st Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, ICAS 2018-0104.##
Petrov, A. V. (2012). Aerodynamics of STOL airplanes with powered high-lift systems. In Proceedings of the 28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, ICAS 2012-9.5.2.##
Radespiel, R., M. Burnazzi, M. Casper and P. Scholz (2016). Active flow control for high lift with steady blowing. The Aeronautical Journal 120(1223), 171-200.##
Rosenblum, J. P., P. Vrchota, A. Prachar, S. H. Peng, and S. Wallin (2019). Active flow separation control at the outer wing. CEAS Aeronautical Journal.##
Rudolph, P. K. C. (1996). High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners. NASA Contractor Report 4746.##
Rumsey, C. L. and J. Hannon (2011). Description of transformations between stowed and un-stowed coordinates.https://hiliftpw.larc.nasa.gov/Workshop1/stowing-unstowing.txt.##
Rumsey, C. L., J. P. Slotnick, M. Long, R. A. Stuever and T. R. Wayman (2011). Summary of the first AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop. Journal of Aircraft 48(6), 2068-2079.##
Rumsey, C. L., T. B. Gatski, S. X. Ying and A. Bertelrud (1997). Prediction of high-lift flows using turbulent closure models. In Proceedings of the 15th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta GA, AIAA.##
Salimi, M. R., R. Askari and M. Hasani (2022). Computational investigation of effects of side-injection geometry on thrust-vectoring performance in a fuel-injected dual throat nozzle. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 15(4).##
Seifert, A., A. Darabi and I. Wygnanski (1996). Delay of airfoil stall by periodic excitation. AIAA Journal 33(4), 691-698.##
Seifert, A., T. Bachar, D. Koss, J. M. Shepshelovich and I. Wygnanski (1993). Oscillatory blowing: a tool to delay boundary layer separation. AIAA Journal 31(11), 2052-2060.##
Sellers III, W. L., G. S. Jones and M. D. Moore (2002). Flow control research at NASA Langley in support of high-lift augmentation. In Proceedings of 2002 Biennial International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibit, Williamsburg VA, AIAA.##
Shmilovich, A., Y. Yadlin and E. A. Whalen (2018). Active flow control computations: from a single actuator to a complete airplane. AIAA Journal 56(12), 4730-4740.##
Singh, D. K., A. Jain and A. R. Paul (2021). Active flow control over a NACA23012 airfoil using hybrid jet. Defence Science Journa 71(6), 721-729.##
Slotnick, J.  P., J. A. Hannon and M. Chaffin (2011). Overview of the first AIAA CFD high lift prediction workshop. In Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando FL, AIAA.##
Spalart, P. and S. Allmaras (1992). A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In Proceedings of the 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, AIAA.##
Tesar, V., C. Hung and W. Zimmerman (2006). No-moving-part hybrid-synthetic jet actuator, Sensors Actuators A: Physical 125(2), 159-169.##
Washburn, A. E., S. A. Gorton and S. G. Anders (2002). Snapshot of active flow control research at NASA Langley. In Proceedings of 1st Flow Control Conference, Saint Louis MO, AIAA.##
Wild, J. (2020). Editorial for the CEAS aeronautical journal special issue on active flow control research within the AFLoNext project. CEAS Aeronautical Journal (11), 803-804.##
  • Received: 06 September 2022
  • Revised: 23 November 2022
  • Accepted: 22 December 2022
  • Available online: 01 April 2023