Effect of Tank Diameter on Solid Suspension in Industrial Reactor Vessels

Document Type : Regular Article


Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, Telangana-506004, India



Present research study analyses the suitability of baffled reactor vessels with large diameter agitated using the Rushton Turbine (RT) impeller maintained at standard clearance condition for the solid-liquid suspension process. The mean and turbulent flow fields associated with reactor vessels of various diameter were simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach. The impeller rotation was modelled using Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) technique and entrainment of air was simulated using Volume of Fluid (VOF) method respectively. The increase in the diameter of reactor vessel keeping impeller at standard clearance condition lead to the transition from double to single loop pattern with considerable decrease in the power number. In large reactor vessels, a low pressure zone is developed below the impeller which deflects the discharge streams and trailing vortices towards bottom surface of the reactor vessel causing the formation of single loop down-pumping pattern. The downward propagation of trailing vortices weaken the flow separation region behind the impeller blades which in turn decreases the form drag and power number of the impeller. The development of single loop down-pumping pattern, high magnitudes of axial velocity, vortex and turbulence fields near vessel bottom and inferior entrainment of air makes the large reactor vessels suitable for the solid-liquid suspension process. The high magnitudes of axial velocity developed below the impeller of large reactor vessel with same power consumption as compared to low clearance vessel makes the former vessel configuration more suitable for the solid-liquid suspension process.


Main Subjects

Alcamo, R., Micale, G., Grisafi, F., Brucato, A., & Ciofalo, M. (2005). Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an unbaffled stirred tank driven by a Rushton turbine. Chemical Engineering Science, 60(8–9), 2303–2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.017
Alonzo-Garcia, A., Mendoza-Escamilla, V. X., Martinez-Delgadillo, S. A., Gonzalez-Neria, I., Del C Gutiérrez-Torres, C., & Jiménez-Bernal, J. A. (2019). On the performance of different rans based models to describe the turbulent flow in an agitated vessel using non-structured grids and PIV validation. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 36(1), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20190361s20180091
ANSYS, I. (2013). ANSYS fluent theory guide (Release, 1). ANSYS.
Armenante, P. M., & Nagamine, E. U. (1998). Effect of low off-bottom impeller clearance on the minimum agitation speed for complete suspension of solids in stirred tanks. Chemical Engineering Science, 53(9), 1757–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00001-3
Armenante, P. M., Nagamine, E. U., & Susanto, J. (1998). Determination of Correlations to Predict the Minimum Agitation Speed for Complete Solid Suspension in Agitated Vessels. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 76, 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450760310
Başbuğ, S., Papadakis, G., & Vassilicos, J. C. (2018). Reduced power consumption in stirred vessels by means of fractal impellers. AIChE Journal, 64(4), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16096
Bates, R. L., Fondy, P. L., & Corpstein, R. R. (1963). Examination of some geometric parameters of impeller power. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 2(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260008a011
Celik, B., Ghia, U., Roache, P. J., Freitas, C. J., Coleman, H., & Raad, P. E. (2008). Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130(7), 078001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953
Conti, R., Sicardi, S., & Specchia, V. (1981). Short communication. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 22, 247–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023624021000019333
Coroneo, M., Montante, G., Paglianti, A., & Magelli, F. (2011). CFD prediction of fluid flow and mixing in stirred tanks: Numerical issues about the RANS simulations. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(10), 1959–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.12.007
Deglon, D. A., & Meyer, C. J. (2006). CFD modelling of stirred tanks: Numerical considerations. Minerals Engineering, 19(10), 1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2006.04.001
Freitas, C. J. (2002). The issue of numerical uncertainty. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 26(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(01)00058-0
Galletti, C., Brunazzi, E., Yianneskis, M., & Paglianti, A. (2003). Spectral and wavelet analysis of the flow pattern transition with impeller clearance variations in a stirred vessel. Chemical Engineering Science, 58(17), 3859–3875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00230-6
Harriott, P. (1962). Mass transfer to particles: Part I. Suspended in agitated tanks. AIChE Journal, 8(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690080122
Hirt, C. W., & Nicholas, B. D. (1981). Volume of fluid method for the dynamics of free surface boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39, 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
Huang, Y., & Green, M. A. (2015). Detection and tracking of vortex phenomena using Lagrangian coherent structures. Experiments in Fluids, 56(7), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2001-z
Iyer, D. K., & Patel, A. K. (2022). Physical Reasoning of Double- to Single-Loop Transition in Industrial Reactors using Computational Fluid Dynamics. J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 15 (5), 1621-1634. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.15.05.1190.
Jirout, T., & Jiroutová, D. (2020). Application of theoretical and experimental findings for optimization of mixing processes and equipment. Processes, 8(955), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080955
Joshi, J. B., Nere, N. K., Rane, C. V., Murthy, B. N., Mathpati, C. S., Patwardhan, A. W., & Ranade, V. V. (2011). CFD simulation of stirred tanks: Comparison of turbulence models. Part I: Radial flow impellers. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 89(1), 23–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20446
Karpinska, A. M., & Bridgeman, J. (2018). CFD as a tool to optimize aeration tank design and operation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 144(2), 05017008 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001307
Kolář, V. (1961). Studies on mixing. X. Suspending solid particles in liquids by means of mechanical agitation. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications, 26(3), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc19610613
Li, Z., Bao, Y., & Gao, Z. (2011). PIV experiments and large eddy simulations of single-loop flow fields in Rushton turbine stirred tanks. Chemical Engineering Science, 66(6), 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.024
Longest, P. W., & Vinchurkar, S. (2007). Effects of mesh style and grid convergence on particle deposition in bifurcating airway models with comparisons to experimental data. Medical Engineering & Physics, 29(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.05.012
Montante, G., Brucato, A., Lee, K. C., & Yianneskis, M. (1999). An experimental study of double-to-single-loop transition in stirred vessels. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 77(4), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450770405
Montante, G., Lee, K. C., Brucato, A., & Yianneskis, M. (2001). Numerical simulations of the dependency of flow pattern on impeller clearance in stirred vessels. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(12), 3751–3770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00089-6
Nienow, A. W. (1968). Suspension of solid particles in turbine agitated baffled vessels. Chemical Engineering Science, 23(12), 1453-1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726358708904551
Oberkampf, W. L., & Trucano, T. G. (2002). Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(3), 209–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2
Ochieng, A., & Onyango, M. S. (2008). Homogenization energy in a stirred tank. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 47(9–10), 1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.10.014
Ochieng, A., Onyango, M. S., Kumar, A., Kiriamiti, K., & Musonge, P. (2008). Mixing in a tank stirred by a Rushton turbine at a low clearance. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 47(5), 842–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.01.034

Sepro mixing & pumping. (2022, August 20). Mixing fundamentals: solids suspension. 101A-9850 201 Street, Langley, British Columbia VIM 4A3, Canada. https://mixing.seprosystems.com

Van Der Molen, K., & Van Maanen, H. R. E. (1978). Laser-Doppler measurements of the turbulent flow in stirred vessels to establish scaling rules. Chemical Engineering Science, 33(9), 1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(78)85081-7
Vinchurkar, S., & Longest, P. W. (2008). Evaluation of hexahedral, prismatic and hybrid mesh styles for simulating respiratory aerosol dynamics. Computers & Fluids, 37(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.05.001
Wu, H., & Patterson, G. K. (1989). Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent-flow parameters in a stirred mixer. Chemical Engineering Science, 44(10), 2207–2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(89)85155-3
Yapici, K., Karasozen, B., Schäfer, M., & Uludag, Y. (2008). Numerical investigation of the effect of the Rushton type turbine design factors on agitated tank flow characteristics. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 47(8), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.05.002
Zhu, Q., Xiao, H., Chen, A., Geng, S., & Huang, Q. (2019). CFD study on double- to single-loop flow pattern transition and its influence on macro mixing efficiency in fully baffled tank stirred by a Rushton turbine. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 27(5), 993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.10.002
Zwietering, T. N. (1958). Suspending of solid particles in liquid by agitators. Chemical Engineering Science, 8(3–4), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(58)85031-9