Research on the Three-dimensional Transient Characteristics of the Hydraulic System during Load Rejection with Combined Regulation of Ball Valve and Guide Vanes in the Entire Hydraulic Passage of the Pumped Storage Power Stations

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China

2 Beijing Engineering Research Center of Safety and Energy Saving Technology for Water Supply Network System, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China

3 CGGC International LTD., Beijing, 100000, China

4 North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, He’nan, 450000, China

5 Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, 01609, USA

10.47176/jafm.18.9.3391

Abstract

The complex transient flow field in the entire hydraulic system of a large pump turbine under load rejection conditions, involving the simultaneous closing of the ball valve and guide vanes, is comprehensively investigated using the Re-Normalization Group (RNG)k-e model and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technique. The predicted pressures at the volute inlet and guide vane outlet show good agreement with the field test data, with corresponding relative errors of 0.87% and 0.33%, respectively, between the predicted maximum pressures and those measured in the field. The main frequencies of pressure at the volute inlet are the unit rotating frequency during the initial time stages (0–3s), and low-frequency fluctuations in the later stages (3–8s and 8–11s). In contrast, the corresponding frequencies at the guide vane outlet are consistent with the blade frequency. During the ball valve closing process, as the unit rotational speed increases, complex flow separations cause vortices near the middle of the runner to coalesce into two large vortices of similar size. Meanwhile, the cross-sectional area of the vortex rope in the draft tube increases, and its spiral shape becomes increasingly irregular until it breaks apart. Based on the Q criterion, a series of 3D complex vortices form inside and downstream of the ball valve at the onset of the combined closing stage, intensifying as the guide vanes close. A spiral-shaped vortex rope in the draft tube extends downstream, breaking into smaller vortices after passing through the draft tube elbow, with the location of the fracture moving upstream as the flow rate decreases further.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Avdyushenko, A. Y., Cherny, S. G., Chirkov, D. V., Skorospelov, V.A., & Turuk, P.A. (2013). Numerical simulation of transient processes in hydroturbines. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 20(5), 577-593. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0869864313050059
Chen, S., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Transient behavior of two-stage load rejection for multiple units system in pumped storage plants. Renewable Energy, 160, 1012-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.116
Chen, S., Zhang, J., Li, G., & Yu, X. (2019). Influence mechanism of geometric characteristics of water conveyance system on extreme water hammer during load rejection in pumped storage plants. Energies, 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152854
Feng, C., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024). A novel multi-excitation transient vibration framework for coupling three- and one-dimensional pumped storage hydropower shafting systems. Physics of Fluids, 36(10). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0229598
Fu, X., Li, D., Song, Y., Wang, H., & Wei, X. (2023). High-amplitude pressure fluctuations of a pump-turbine with large head variable ratio during the turbine load rejection process. Science China: Technological Sciences (English), 66(9), 2575-2585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2322-9
Fu, X., Li, D., Wang, H., Li, Z., Zhao, Q., & Wei, X. (2021). One- and three-dimensional coupling flow simulations of pumped-storage power stations with complex long-distance water conveyance pipeline system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, 128228 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128228
Fu, X., Li, D., Wang, H., Zhang, G., Li, Z., & Wei, X. (2020). Numerical simulation of the transient flow in a pump-turbine during load rejection process with special emphasis on hydraulic acoustic effect. Renewable Energy, 155, 1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.006
Guo, P. C., Zhang, H., & Sun, L. G. (2020). Transient dynamic analysis of a pump-turbine with hysteresis effect. Modern Physics Letters B, 2050125. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984920501250
He, X., Hu, J., Zhao, Z., Lin, J., Xiao P., Yang J., & Yang, J. (2023). Water column separation under one-after-another load rejectionin pumped storage station. Energy. 278, 127809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127809
Hoffstaedt, J. P., Truijen, D. P. K., Fahlbeck, J., Gans, L. H. A., Qudaih, M., Laguna, A. J., De Kooning, J. D. M., Stockman, K., Nilsson, H., Storli, P. T., Engel, B., Marence, M., & Bricker, J. D. (2022). Low-head pumped hydro storage: A review of applicable technologies for design, grid integration, control and modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112119
Jurasz, J., & Mikulik, J. (2017). A strategy for the photovoltaic-powered pumped storage hydroelectricity. Energy & Environment, 28(5), 1-20. 0958305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0958305x17714174
Li, X., Tang, X., Shi, X. Chen, H., & Li, C. (2018). Load rejection transient with joint closing law of ball-valve and guide vane for two units in pumped storage power station. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20(2), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2017.106
Liu, D., Zhang, X., Yang, Z. Li, Z., Zhao, Q., & Wei, X. (2021). Evaluating the pressure fluctuations during load rejection of two pump-turbines in a prototype pumped-storage system by using 1D-3D coupled simulation. Renewable Energy, 171, 1276-1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128228
Mao, X., Chen, X., Lu, J., Liu, P., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Improving internal fluid stability of pump turbine in load rejection process by co-adjusting inlet valve and guide vane. Journal of Energy Storage, 50, 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104623
Pavesi, G., Giovanna, C., & Ardizzon, G. (2018). Numerical simulation of a pump–turbine transient load following process in pump mode. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 140, 021114. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037988]
Rezghi, A., & Riasi, A. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of transient flow of two parallel pump-turbines operating at runaway. Renewable Energy, 86, 611-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.059
Sharon, M. (2020). 1D and 3D water-hammer models: The energetics of high friction pipe flow and hydropower load rejection. University of Toronto. Toronto, Canada.
Vakil, A., & Firouzabadi, B. (2009). Investigation of valve-closing law on the maximum head rise of a hydropower plant. Scientia Iranica, 16(3), 222-228. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029313
Walseth, E. C., Nielsen, T. K., & Svingen, B. (2016). Measuring the dynamic characteristics of a low specific speed pump-turbine model. Energies, 9(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030199
Wang, W., Giorgio, P., Pei, J. & Yuan, S. (2019). Transient simulation on closure of wicket gates in a high-head Francis-type reversible turbine operating in pump mode. Renewable Energy, 145, 1817-1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.052
Widmer, C., Staubli, T., & Ledergerber, N. (2011). Unstable characteristics and rotating stall in turbine brake operation of pump-turbines. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 133(4), 041101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003874
Yang, Z., Cheng, Y., Xia, L. Meng, W., Liu K., & Zhang, X. (2020). Evolutions of flow patterns and pressure fluctuations in a prototype pump-turbine during the runaway transient process after pump-trip. Renewable Energy, 152, 1149-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.079
Yin, C., Zeng, W., & Yang, J. (2021). Transient simulation and analysis of the simultaneous load rejection process in pumped storage power stations using a 1-D-3-D coupling method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 33(5), 979-991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0087-8
Zeng, W., Yang, J., & Guo, W. (2015). Runaway instability of pump-turbines in S-shaped regions considering water compressibility. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 137(5), 051401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029313
Zeng, W., Yang, J., & Hu, J. (2017). Pumped storage system model and experimental investigations on S-induced issues during transients. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 90, 350-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.12.031
Zhang, F., Fang, M., Tao, R., Zhu, D., Liu, W., Lin, F., & Xiao, R. (2024). Chaotic analysis of the reversible pump turbine exhaust process in pump mode based on a data-driven method. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 17(11), 2361-2376. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.17.11.2669
Zhang, H., Guo, P., & Sun, L., (2020). Transient analysis of a multi-unit pumped storage system during load rejection process. Renewable Energy, 152, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.111
Zhang, X., & Cheng, Y., (2012). Simulation of hydraulic transients in hydropower systems using the 1-D-3-D coupling approach. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 24(4), 595-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60282-5
Zhang, X., Cheng, Y., Xia, L., Yang, J., & Qian, Z. (2016). Looping dynamic characteristics of a pump-turbine in the S-shaped region during runaway. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 138(9), 091102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033297
Zheng, Y., Chen Q., Yan, D. & Liu, W. (2020). A two-stage numerical simulation framework for pumped-storage energy system. Energy Conversion and Management, 210, 112676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112676
Zhou, D., Chen, Y., Chen, H., Chen, S., & Yang, C. (2019). Study of hydraulic disturbances from single-unit load rejection in a pumped-storage hydropower station with a shared water delivery system. IEEE Access, 7, 153382-153390. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947301
Zhou, T., Yu, X., Zhang. J., & Xu, H. (2024). Analysis of transient pressure of pump-turbine during load rejection based on a multi-step extraction method. Energy, 292, 130678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130578
Volume 18, Issue 9 - Serial Number 101
September 2025
Pages 2180-2201
  • Received: 22 January 2025
  • Revised: 06 April 2025
  • Accepted: 29 April 2025
  • Available online: 05 July 2025